810 results found
-
QM - Reports – Interaction and Evaluation Date
Please add a differentiator in reporting so that the user can run a report based on the interaction date or the evaluation date.
6 votes -
QM - Feedback Comments - Punctuation Doesn't Carry Over from Word
A user may need to type their feedback comments into a Word document first and then copy/paste into the QM Tool Evaluation Form. When we copy/paste from Word into the QM Tool, quotation marks and apostrophes disappear.
2 votes -
QM - Calibration Screen – Needs Interaction Dates
Please add the Interaction Date to the Calibration Screen; see screenshot
2 votes -
QM - Calibration Tool - Can't See Calibrator's Forms w/ Comments
When a calibrator submits their evaluation for a calibration, the calibration form is gone; it can’t be accessed anywhere. We should be able to see the different calibrators forms in the Calibration tool. All we see is the variance. We need to see each person’s forms with comments.
6 votes -
QM - Reports - Form Name Titles – Don’t Display Fully
In reports, the form names are cut off/short. When the user hovers over the form name, the full name should reflect. I have attached screenshots.
1 vote -
QM - Reports – Only Active Forms Should Display
For reporting, inactive forms shouldn’t be on the drop-down list. This is too many to sort through. Please only reflect Active forms.
4 votes -
14 votes
-
Reducing Effort in Contact History Report
When entering a master ID in the contact history report, users have to click Run Report instead of being able to just hit return.
2 votes -
Show reporting on Abandoned calls for non full Admin users
Some customers use RCCC in various parts of their business who should not have a view of each other. However, they cannot see Abandoned calls in Reporting as these aren't assigned a team / campaign. They can only do so when All & Future is enabled from the role & permission.
1 vote -
QM - Editing a Submitted Evaluation
If a user submits an evaluation, and they realize they made a mistake, they must wait for the agent to review the evaluation and ‘Request Review’. A user should be able to ‘edit’ the evaluation form without the agent having to take this step. The agent might be out of the office or can’t get to it right away. The user needs to fix the evaluation score immediately and not wait, so an edit option is necessary.
8 votes -
QM - Character Limitation
When typing feedback comments in the Evaluation Form, there is a character limitation of 256 characters. It’s important to leave detailed feedback and limiting the characters diminishes the quality of the feedback.
4 votes -
QM - Report Delay
There is a delay in reporting in the Quality Management Tool. When a user submits an evaluation, it takes about 1-2 hours to reflect in the reports. There shouldn’t be a delay.
1 vote -
QM - Bonus Point Capability
There is currently no option to set up bonus point questions on the evaluation form. Please update the tool so we can give agents the chance to earn bonus points.
3 votes -
QM - Request Further Review - Shouldn't Go Back to the Evaluator
If an agent submits a ‘Request Further Review’, this means they are ‘Challenging’ the score and want it re-reviewed. Currently, the dispute routes back to the Evaluator. This shouldn’t go back to the Evaluator but to a third-party person, like the QM Manager or Supervisor.
3 votes -
QM - Evaluation Notifications – Need Via Email
When a user submits an evaluation, only the person who was evaluated receives a notification, and it’s via the system, but not via email. I’d like to request that the system email the user an email notification that a new evaluation is ready to review.
12 votes -
QM – Evaluation Notifications – More Than One User
When a user submits an evaluation, only the person being evaluated receives the notification via the QM Tool that a new evaluation is ready to review. We should be able to choose additional people to receive a notification, like the agent's supervisor, for example. More than one person should be able to receive the notification.
15 votes -
To allow a user to have the InContact SalesForce agent “lightning” dialer open and functional in multiple Salesforce browser tabs.
When using the SalesForce “Classic” dialer, a user could open a new (Chrome) browser tab with the same Salesforce session, and then open the “Classic” SalesForce Agent InContact dialer on each active Salesforce tab. It is common for our users to open additional Salesforce browser tabs to complete different functions within SalesForce (ex: A customer record, a Gantt chart, an inventory record, Geo Portal, and potentially others)This was not an issue with the “Classic” Dialer However, with the “Lightning” dialer, the first instance of the dialer opens normally – And when a user opens a second (and additional) Salesforce browser…
5 votes -
Reporting for Contact Center Numbers in RCO
ability to track usage and trends of phone numbers that are assigned to contact center services, today we do not have this ability and cannot monitor usage for CC services easily.
20 votes -
Addition to Dynamic Address Book
Agent's utilizing MAX agent address book would like to provide the DID / digital line number for external callers ahead of transferring to the employee.
3 votes -
Combine both mandatory disposition & ACW time
At present, you can either set a disposition in a skill to be mandatory, or provide a timer for after call work. Some customers have requested the ability to make a disposition mandatory & also count down the ACW rather than one or the other. The ability to provide a default disposition to be used if timer ends before a disposition is entered would be helpful as well. Ideal Scenario: Agent is mandated to provide a disposition, but after call work is timed.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?