1071 results found
-
QM - Reports - Form Name Titles – Don’t Display Fully
In reports, the form names are cut off/short. When the user hovers over the form name, the full name should reflect. I have attached screenshots.
1 vote -
QM - Reports – Only Active Forms Should Display
For reporting, inactive forms shouldn’t be on the drop-down list. This is too many to sort through. Please only reflect Active forms.
4 votes -
14 votes
-
Reducing Effort in Contact History Report
When entering a master ID in the contact history report, users have to click Run Report instead of being able to just hit return.
2 votes -
Show reporting on Abandoned calls for non full Admin users
Some customers use RCCC in various parts of their business who should not have a view of each other. However, they cannot see Abandoned calls in Reporting as these aren't assigned a team / campaign. They can only do so when All & Future is enabled from the role & permission.
1 vote -
QM - Editing a Submitted Evaluation
If a user submits an evaluation, and they realize they made a mistake, they must wait for the agent to review the evaluation and ‘Request Review’. A user should be able to ‘edit’ the evaluation form without the agent having to take this step. The agent might be out of the office or can’t get to it right away. The user needs to fix the evaluation score immediately and not wait, so an edit option is necessary.
8 votes -
QM - Character Limitation
When typing feedback comments in the Evaluation Form, there is a character limitation of 256 characters. It’s important to leave detailed feedback and limiting the characters diminishes the quality of the feedback.
3 votes -
QM - Report Delay
There is a delay in reporting in the Quality Management Tool. When a user submits an evaluation, it takes about 1-2 hours to reflect in the reports. There shouldn’t be a delay.
1 vote -
QM - Bonus Point Capability
There is currently no option to set up bonus point questions on the evaluation form. Please update the tool so we can give agents the chance to earn bonus points.
3 votes -
QM - Request Further Review - Shouldn't Go Back to the Evaluator
If an agent submits a ‘Request Further Review’, this means they are ‘Challenging’ the score and want it re-reviewed. Currently, the dispute routes back to the Evaluator. This shouldn’t go back to the Evaluator but to a third-party person, like the QM Manager or Supervisor.
3 votes -
QM - Evaluation Notifications – Need Via Email
When a user submits an evaluation, only the person who was evaluated receives a notification, and it’s via the system, but not via email. I’d like to request that the system email the user an email notification that a new evaluation is ready to review.
12 votes -
QM – Evaluation Notifications – More Than One User
When a user submits an evaluation, only the person being evaluated receives the notification via the QM Tool that a new evaluation is ready to review. We should be able to choose additional people to receive a notification, like the agent's supervisor, for example. More than one person should be able to receive the notification.
15 votes -
Suppression Scripts
Some customers use 'agent flag' on outbound leads to reserve lead 'x' for that agent. Should another agent search for a lead, they would have the ability to dial this lead whether or not it is theirs. Something like suppression scripts, where the system does a check at the moment of dial attempt against some sort permissions list, would help manage this solution. Suppression scripting could be used in numerous ways within RingCX especially around manual dialing.
2 votes -
Automatic hold for warm transfers using integrated phone
Many customers would like to have a warm transferred call automatically put the far end on hold. This functionality is available within agent scripting. However, some customers use the RingEX extension integration which would require the agent scripting to use webservices. This change would give customers the ability to choose how they would like to handle warm transfers on a queue/campaign level and would alleviate the lift required to mimic this functionality.
20 votes -
Set of RingCX inbound ports to be minimized
RingCX requires many ingress firewall ports to be opened.
4 votes -
To allow a user to have the InContact SalesForce agent “lightning” dialer open and functional in multiple Salesforce browser tabs.
When using the SalesForce “Classic” dialer, a user could open a new (Chrome) browser tab with the same Salesforce session, and then open the “Classic” SalesForce Agent InContact dialer on each active Salesforce tab. It is common for our users to open additional Salesforce browser tabs to complete different functions within SalesForce (ex: A customer record, a Gantt chart, an inventory record, Geo Portal, and potentially others)This was not an issue with the “Classic” Dialer However, with the “Lightning” dialer, the first instance of the dialer opens normally – And when a user opens a second (and additional) Salesforce browser…
5 votes -
Reporting for Contact Center Numbers in RCO
ability to track usage and trends of phone numbers that are assigned to contact center services, today we do not have this ability and cannot monitor usage for CC services easily.
19 votes -
Track number destination search
Within the "track numbers" section of the RingCX platform, we have the ability to ring multiple destinations in parallel or sequential. This is a great tool, since there isn't a 'technology cap,' limiting the amount of destinations can be run simultaneously. However, from a management perspective, there is little ability to search/filter on the assigned number destinations. For customers who wish to use both RingCX as well as RingEX features, having the ability to use the track number feature for high volume 'ring groups' would be advantageous. One example would be when a customer hits the ring-group limitation of RingEX.
4 votes -
3rd Party Connector for Non-Native Messaging Channels and High Volume SMS (International)
Specific improvements in terms of 3rd party messaging channels:
WeChat support
LINE support
Telegram Support
High Volume SMS API for international customersInternational customers have requested a few 3rd party channels (listed above) not natively supported on RingCX. The request is to use a 3rd party service for a connector.
4 votes -
Addition to Dynamic Address Book
Agent's utilizing MAX agent address book would like to provide the DID / digital line number for external callers ahead of transferring to the employee.
3 votes
- Don't see your idea?